I used to treat email outreach like throwing confetti: scatter a bunch of generic subject lines into the void and hope something sparkled back. After years of pitching editors and influencers for stories, listicles, and collabs for Mycomps Co, I got tired of hearing crickets. So I ran a tiny experiment: what one subject line consistently gets replies? I A/B tested dozens of subject lines across pitches to editors, influencers, and creators. The winner surprised me — and it’s simple enough that you can use it tomorrow.
What I tested and why
I sent pitches to about 120 people over six weeks: magazine editors, newsletter writers, podcast hosts, and mid-tier influencers (20k–200k followers). The pitches themselves varied: story ideas, product gifts, collaboration invites, and quick interview requests. I kept the body of the emails short and tailored, but the subject line was the variable.
I tracked open rates, reply rates, and the quality of replies (meaning whether the reply led to a real opportunity or just “no thanks”). I excluded automatic replies and people who never opened the email. The goal wasn’t just vanity opens — it was getting a human to write back.
The subject line that outperformed everything
The clear winner was:
"Quick question about [specific thing they published or posted]"
That exact structure — starting with "Quick question" then naming something specific they did — got the highest reply rate by a comfortable margin. It’s not flashy. It’s not clickbaity. But it works. Here’s why.
Why “Quick question about [specific thing]” works
Examples that I used (real templates you can copy)
Swap in specifics and keep the body short. Here are some subject line templates based on the winning formula:
And here’s a full email example that got a reply from an entertainment editor at a mid-size outlet:
| Subject | Quick question about your round-up of summer comedies |
| Body | Hi [Name], I loved your round-up of summer comedies — the callout to [Film] was spot-on. Quick question: would you be open to a short piece on underrated rom-coms that are scoring on streaming? I can send three brief blurbs with streaming links if that helps. — Éloïse |
How I crafted the "specific thing"
The specificity matters, but it doesn’t have to be exotic. Use one clear detail:
It’s tempting to go deep and reference multiple paragraphs, but simpler is better. Naming one thing keeps the subject tidy and scannable.
When the subject line fails
This formula isn’t magic. It fails when:
Also, some gatekeepers use team inboxes that filter subject lines. If the person you’re targeting works for a large outlet, a personal approach on Twitter/LinkedIn sometimes works better after the initial email attempt.
Timing and frequency tips
Timing matters almost as much as wording. From my testing:
How to match the body to the subject
The subject promises "quick." Deliver on that promise. My go-to body structure:
Example:
Hi [Name],
I loved your piece on retro sitcoms — your take on Episode 3 made me snort-laugh. Quick question: would you be interested in a 300-word list of underrated sitcom pilots streaming now? I can send it ready to paste.
— Éloïse
Variants that also worked
If "Quick question about..." feels overused, I had success with a few close cousins:
What to avoid in the subject line
Since I started using this formula consistently, my reply rate doubled compared with my old generic subjects. More importantly, the replies were useful: many led to published pieces, podcast slots, and influencer collabs that actually moved the needle for Mycomps Co.
If you want, I can share a swipe file of subject lines and short email bodies tailored to editors, podcasters, and influencers. Drop a tip or a link to a target outlet and I’ll mock up 3 ready-to-send emails.